Constraint Intelligence Engine

Version: 2.0
Date: September 12, 2025
(Revised based on architectural and implementation feedback)

1. Overview & Objective

The Constraint Intelligence Engine is the core analytical component of the ChainAlign platform, responsible for validating S&OP plans against business realities. Its objective is to provide a clear, trustworthy, and progressively sophisticated analysis of a plan's feasibility, starting with a robust deterministic foundation and evolving to include probabilistic risk assessment and AI-driven insights.

2. Core Design Principles (Revised)

• System Throughput Focus: The engine's primary purpose is to identify the single bottleneck constraint that governs the entire system's capacity and throughput. All analysis flows from this principle.
• Strategic Alignment: All constraint-based trade-offs and recommendations must be evaluated against the company's active goals, as managed by the StrategicObjectivesEngine. Operational feasibility must serve strategic objectives.
• Foundation First: The engine must first master deterministic constraint checking before modeling uncertainty. Customer trust is built on getting the basics right [cite: your feedback].
• Data Quality Over Model Sophistication: The engine's primary focus will be on the robust validation of input data quality, as this has the greatest impact on output reliability [cite: your feedback].
• Clarity & User Calibration: The system must provide clear explanations for its outputs and include a framework for users to validate simulation results against historical scenarios to build trust [cite: your feedback].
• Performance by Design: All analyses, especially interactive scenarios, must adhere to a strict performance budget to ensure a fluid user experience [cite: your feedback].

3. Constraint Hierarchy Definition

As recommended, the engine will explicitly categorize and model three types of constraints [cite: your feedback]:

Constraint Type	Description	Examples	How the Engine Treats It
Hard Constraints	Absolute physical or regulatory limits that cannot be violated. These represent potential system bottlenecks.	Maximum Production Capacity, Regulatory Limits, Warehouse Space.	A binary pass/fail. Any plan violating a hard constraint is flagged as infeasible, and the most violated constraint is identified as the primary bottleneck.
Soft Constraints	Business targets or policy goals that are desirable but can be strategically violated with a trade-off.	Target Service Levels, Target Gross Margin %, Inventory Turn Goals.	A variance calculation. Violations are flagged with a quantified business impact (e.g., "-0.5% margin hit") and their effect on strategic objectives.
Dynamic Constraints	Constraints whose values change over time based on known patterns or external factors.	Seasonal Labor Availability, Supplier Reliability Scores, Scheduled Maintenance.	A time-series input. The engine uses the correct constraint value for the specific planning period being analyzed.

4. Detailed Functional Specifications

4.1. Phase 1: Deterministic Constraint Checking Engine

This is the foundational layer of the engine, focused on providing clear, deterministic validation of an S&OP plan.

1. Bottleneck Identification:
   • Functionality: When a "Balanced Operations Plan" is created, this engine runs a series of checks to pinpoint the most violated Hard Constraint, identifying it as the primary system bottleneck. The UI will visually highlight this bottleneck and its downstream impact on related Soft Constraints and Strategic Objectives.
2. Financial and Strategic Impact Quantification:
   • Functionality: For every soft constraint violation, the engine will use the Financial Integration model to calculate the precise financial impact. It will also interface with the StrategicObjectivesEngine to display the impact on the Goal Alignment Score.
   • Example Alert: "Violates Soft Constraint 'Target Service Level': The plan results in a 97% service level against a 98.5% target, creating a potential Revenue at Risk of $1.2M. This negatively impacts the 'Increase Market Share' objective, reducing the Goal Alignment Score by 5 points."
3. Trade-off Decision Framework:
   • Functionality: When a plan has conflicting constraints, the system will present a clear "Trade-off Decision" card. For each option, the card will display the financial impact and the projected Goal Alignment Score, allowing users to make a decision that is both operationally sound and strategically aligned.

4.2. Phase 2: Probabilistic Simulation Engine (Monte Carlo)

This layer adds the dimension of uncertainty on top of the validated deterministic foundation.

1. Basic Simulation with Simple Distributions:
   • Functionality: The engine will initially model key variables (Demand Variability, Supplier Lead Time) using simple, well-understood statistical distributions (e.g., normal, uniform) derived from historical data [cite: coreMontecarloCalculations.md, your feedback].
2. User Calibration Framework:
   • Functionality: The engine will include a "Backtesting Mode." A user can select a historical S&OP plan (e.g., from 12 months ago) and run the simulation. The system will then display the simulation's predicted range of outcomes alongside the actual historical results, allowing the user to calibrate and build trust in the model's predictive power [cite: your feedback].
3. Performance Requirements:
   • Functionality: All interactive Monte Carlo simulations must be designed to return results within a sub-30-second performance SLA for the 95th percentile of scenarios [cite: your feedback]. This will be achieved through performance optimization techniques like adaptive sample sizes and result caching.

4.3. Phase 3 & 4: Advanced Modeling & AI Enhancement

These more advanced capabilities will be built once the deterministic and basic probabilistic foundations are proven and validated with customers.

1. Correlation Modeling (Phase 3):
   • Functionality: Introduce a correlation matrix to model the relationships between key variables, based on validated use cases from the initial pilots [cite: coreMontecarloCalculations.md, your feedback].
2. AI-driven Investment Recommendation (Phase 4):
   • Functionality: The AI will analyze the system's primary bottleneck and recommend specific investments (e.g., increasing capacity, qualifying a new supplier) that will have the greatest positive impact on the Goal Alignment Score.
3. AI-driven Proactive Bottleneck Detection (Phase 4):
   • Functionality: The AI will be used to proactively identify when a new bottleneck is likely to emerge as a result of changes in the system (e.g., a shift in product mix), allowing for a continuous improvement loop.
4. AI Enhancement (Phase 4):
   • Functionality: Layer on the AIRiskIntelligence and AIStorytellingEngine services. The AI will be used to enhance the simulation with external risk context, perform advanced root cause analysis on the results, and generate the executive-ready narrative summaries [cite: coreMontecarloCalculations.md, your feedback].

5. Implementation Roadmap (Revised)

• Phase 1: Deterministic Foundations:
  • Implement the full Deterministic Constraint Checking Engine.
  • Define and implement the UI for the Constraint Hierarchy (Hard, Soft, Dynamic).
  • Build the Constraint Conflict Resolution workflow.
• Phase 2: Basic Probabilistic Modeling:
  • Implement the Monte Carlo simulator with simple distributions for core variables.
  • Build the User Calibration Framework (Backtesting Mode).
  • Enforce and monitor the sub-30-second performance SLA.
• Phase 3: Advanced Modeling:
  • Introduce Correlation Modeling based on validated data and customer feedback.
  • Begin development of the Multi-Horizon Simulation Framework.
• Phase 4: Full AI Enhancement:
  • Integrate the AIRiskIntelligence service for context-aware inputs.
  • Integrate the AIStorytellingEngine to generate executive-ready narratives from the simulation outputs.

This revised approach ensures that we deliver a robust, trustworthy, and high-value constraint management solution quickly, while providing a clear and pragmatic path to building the sophisticated, AI-powered capabilities that will define ChainAlign's long-term competitive advantage.

---

6. Enhanced Roadmap with Probabilistic Programming (Milestone M64)

The following section outlines an enhanced implementation path that leverages a probabilistic programming library (PPL) like PyMC. This approach, tracked under Milestone M64, accelerates the delivery of advanced modeling capabilities by integrating them earlier in the development cycle.

6.1. Upgraded Phase 2: From "Simple Monte Carlo" to "Bayesian System Modeling"

Instead of modeling variables with simple, isolated statistical distributions, this phase will use PyMC to construct a Bayesian network that models the causal relationships between variables.

• Capability: The model moves from disconnected Demand = Normal(100, 10) samples to a rich, interconnected system like Demand ~ f(Seasonality, Price, Marketing_Spend).
• Benefit: This provides a much more realistic simulation where shocks to one part of the system (e.g., a supplier delay) naturally propagate to others. The engine gains a more fundamentally sound and explainable model of the business.

6.2. Upgraded Phase 3: Absorb "Correlation Modeling" directly into Phase 2

The goal of introducing a correlation matrix is achieved and surpassed by the Bayesian network approach.

• Capability: By defining the causal links between variables, PyMC inherently models the complex dependencies and correlations.
• Benefit: This leapfrogs the need for a separate, rigid correlation matrix. The model captures the cause of the correlation, not just the statistical artifact, making it more robust. This effectively merges the goal of Phase 3 into the new, upgraded Phase 2.

6.3. Upgraded Phase 4: A Clear Path to AI-driven Recommendations

The PyMC framework provides a direct, mathematical path to achieving the AI-driven goals of Phase 4.

• Capability (Investment Recommendation): The engine can perform causal inference and counterfactual analysis. Instead of a vague "AI recommendation," it can answer specific business questions like: "What is the expected impact on profit if we invest $2M to reduce supplier lead time variance by 30%?"
• Capability (Proactive Bottleneck Detection): The model can calculate the posterior probability of each hard constraint becoming the primary bottleneck under various future scenarios.
• Benefit: This transforms abstract "AI" goals into specific, powerful analytical capabilities that provide a quantifiable, defensible business case for decisions.

This enhanced roadmap enables the Constraint Intelligence Engine to deliver a more powerful, integrated, and conceptually sound probabilistic engine from a much earlier stage.