ChainAlign Role Personas & Decision Archetypes Framework
Version: 1.0 Status: Design Phase (MILESTONE 5.1) Date: 2025-10-22 Purpose: Define persona archetypes that drive adaptive page generation, learning, and decision intelligence
Executive Summary
ChainAlign's secret sauce is a persona-based adaptive intelligence system that:
- Identifies which persona best fits each user at registration
- Learns how that persona makes decisions (via interaction tracking)
- Adapts page generation, headlines, metrics, and actions to that specific persona
- Evolves the persona template based on aggregate user behavior
- Personalizes without requiring manual configuration
This framework defines the 12 core personas across two decision flows:
- S&OP Flow (7 personas): Supply chain and operational planning
- Financial Flow (5 personas): Strategic financial management
Part 1: S&OP Decision Flow Personas
Overview
S&OP is about trade-off decisions: Demand vs. Supply vs. Profitability. Each role makes different trade-offs.
Persona 1: S&OP Executive Owner (CEO/COO/GM/VP P&L)
Primary Decision Authority: Final sign-off on all trade-offs
Decision Focus
- Demand vs. Supply vs. Profitability trade-offs
- Capacity investment vs. lost sales
- Market share vs. margin optimization
- Cross-functional consensus
Platform Utility
- Consensus Plan vs. Financial Budget view (alignment check)
- Executive summary: "Are we aligned on the plan? Does it fit the budget?"
- Scenario comparison: "What's the financial impact of each option?"
- Dissent summary: "Which teams don't agree? Why?"
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Strategic/Trade-off (e.g., "To meet $5B revenue target, require 15% capacity investment")
- Hero Section: 3-way waterfall (Demand | Supply Constraint | Financial Impact)
- Metrics: Plan variance to AOP, capital required, ROI
- Context: Cross-functional readiness, dissents, risk flags
- Actions: Approve Plan, Request Changes, Escalate Risk
- Detail Level: Executive summary (2-3 KPIs per section)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Spends time on which trade-offs?
- Approves with/without scenario review?
- Escalates financial or operational risks?
- Decision speed (minutes to hours?)
Data Inputs
- Consensus status across all functions
- Financial plan vs. operating budget
- Scenario financial summaries
- Risk indicators from each function
Persona 2: VP/Director of Supply Chain & Operations
Primary Decision Authority: Supply constraints, capacity, inventory levels, supplier risk
Decision Focus
- Production capacity and scheduling
- Inventory targets vs. service levels
- Supplier risk and diversification
- Lead time and supply variability
- Make-vs-buy decisions
Platform Utility
- Supply-Demand Gap Analysis (primary chart)
- Capacity utilization by product line and time period
- Inventory projections with coverage metrics
- Supplier risk and concentration analysis
- Lead time variability (policy impact)
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Operational (e.g., "Demand exceeds capacity in Q3, requires 2-week production lead extension")
- Hero Section: Supply-demand gap chart + coverage metric
- Metrics: Gap size, timeline to resolution, inventory days, supplier risk
- Context: External factors (policy routing changes, lead time impacts)
- Actions: Adjust production plan, Increase inventory, Source alternative supplier, Request demand adjustment
- Detail Level: Medium (drill into supplier, SKU, time period)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Focuses on which products/suppliers?
- How often reviews lead time impacts?
- Decision speed on capacity trade-offs?
- Uses external data (weather, policy) in decisions?
Data Inputs
- Demand forecast
- Capacity by production line
- Inventory targets and current levels
- Supplier lead times and variability
- Policy events and routing impacts
- Weather-driven demand shifts
Persona 3: VP/Director of Sales
Primary Decision Authority: Unconstrained sales forecast, market intelligence, sales targets
Decision Focus
- Demand forecast accuracy and bias
- Market intelligence and competitive threats
- Sales target alignment and achievability
- Promotional effectiveness
- New customer/product potential
Platform Utility
- Forecast Accuracy & Bias Metrics (primary dashboard)
- Historical forecast vs. actual comparison
- Forecast bias by region, customer, product
- Competitive win/loss analysis
- Promotional impact quantification
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Market (e.g., "Forecast bias in EMEA +8%, suggesting $2.3M upside opportunity")
- Hero Section: Forecast variance trend + by-region breakdown
- Metrics: Forecast accuracy (MAPE), bias, upside/downside, RMSE
- Context: Competitive intelligence, promo effectiveness, market trends
- Actions: Adjust forecast, Review by region, Analyze competitive win/loss, Plan promotion
- Detail Level: Medium (by region, channel, product family)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Reviews which regions/products most?
- Responds to forecast variance alerts?
- Adjusts forecasts based on external data?
- Decision frequency (daily, weekly)?
Data Inputs
- Historical demand vs. forecast
- Market intelligence (news, competitor actions)
- Sales pipeline and conversion rates
- Promotional history and effectiveness
- Weather/policy context (impacts demand)
Persona 4: VP/Director of Finance (FP&A Leader)
Primary Decision Authority: Financial translation of S&OP plan into budget, profitability analysis, AOP gap
Decision Focus
- Plan profitability and margin impact
- Budget allocation and expense management
- Working capital implications
- Annual Operating Plan (AOP) reconciliation
- Scenario financial modeling
Platform Utility
- Integrated P&L Model linking S&OP decisions to profitability
- Cash flow impact of inventory and production decisions
- Working capital analysis (receivables, payables, inventory)
- Scenario P&L and variance analysis
- Financial risk indicators
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Financial (e.g., "Current plan delivers $8.2M EBIT, $1.8M below AOP target")
- Hero Section: P&L waterfall (Revenue | COGS | OpEx | EBIT) + AOP comparison
- Metrics: EBIT, EBITDA, margin %, working capital, cash conversion
- Context: Plan vs. AOP gap, key cost drivers, financial risks
- Actions: Adjust plan, Reduce cost, Improve pricing, Escalate gap
- Detail Level: Medium (by cost category, business unit)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Focuses on which P&L line items?
- How sensitive to working capital?
- Reviews cash flow impact?
- Decision speed on financial trade-offs?
Data Inputs
- S&OP plan (demand, supply, pricing)
- Cost structure (COGS, OpEx)
- Working capital drivers
- AOP targets and assumptions
- Scenario financial impacts
Persona 5: Demand Planner / Forecasting Manager
Primary Decision Authority: Statistical forecast generation, historical data management, demand review facilitation
Decision Focus
- Forecast methodology and model selection
- Historical data quality and adjustments
- Seasonal and trend decomposition
- Outlier detection and handling
- Forecast accuracy improvement
Platform Utility
- Rich Statistical Modeling Tools (the core)
- Time series decomposition (trend, seasonality, residuals)
- Anomaly detection and handling
- Model comparison and selection
- Forecast accuracy diagnostics (ACF, residuals)
- External variable correlation (weather, policy)
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Analytical (e.g., "Temperature correlation explains 52% of demand variance, improves forecast accuracy by 8%")
- Hero Section: Time series chart + residuals + external factor overlay
- Metrics: Forecast accuracy, bias, MAE, RMSE, external correlation strength
- Context: Anomalies, external factors (weather, policy), data quality
- Actions: Adjust model, Include external variable, Handle outlier, Update baseline
- Detail Level: High (granular: by product, region, time period, statistical measures)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Which statistical methods are preferred?
- How often adjusts baseline vs. uses model?
- Responds to anomaly alerts?
- Incorporates external data into models?
Data Inputs
- Historical demand data (clean and detailed)
- External data (weather, policy, economic)
- Statistical models and accuracy metrics
- Anomaly detection results
- Outlier handling decisions
Persona 6: Supply Planner / Production Manager
Primary Decision Authority: Detailed capacity planning, executable schedules, inventory targets
Decision Focus
- Production schedule feasibility
- Inventory target setting by SKU
- Machine scheduling and changeover costs
- Safety stock calculations
- Supply chain lead time management
Platform Utility
- Detailed Capacity Utilization Dashboard
- Production schedule (by machine, shift, product)
- Inventory projections (by SKU, warehouse)
- Lead time adherence tracking
- Changeover and constraint analysis
- Safety stock vs. service level trade-off
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Operational (e.g., "Machine A overloaded 12% in weeks 5-7, recommend pre-production in week 3")
- Hero Section: Capacity utilization Gantt + inventory projection
- Metrics: Utilization %, stockout risk, inventory days, lead time performance
- Context: Constraint location, bottleneck products, lead time impacts
- Actions: Adjust production schedule, Pre-produce, Reduce batch size, Request capacity increase
- Detail Level: High (by machine, SKU, week)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Focuses on which machines/products?
- How often adjusts inventory targets?
- Responds to stockout risk alerts?
- Lead time variability sensitivity?
Data Inputs
- Production plan and demand forecast
- Machine capacity and constraints
- Current and projected inventory
- Lead times by supplier (with variability)
- Changeover costs and times
Persona 7: VP/Director of Marketing
Primary Decision Authority: Demand shaping via promotions, pricing, NPIs
Decision Focus
- Promotion planning and ROI analysis
- Pricing optimization
- New Product Introduction (NPI) timing and volume
- Market share and competitive positioning
- Campaign effectiveness tracking
Platform Utility
- Promotional Impact Quantification
- Promotion ROI analysis (lift vs. cost)
- Pricing elasticity and optimization models
- NPI demand ramp scenarios
- Campaign effectiveness tracking
- Incremental volume vs. cannibalization
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Market (e.g., "Q2 promotion drives $3.2M incremental revenue, 18% ROI vs. 12% threshold")
- Hero Section: Promotion impact chart + ROI comparison
- Metrics: Lift %, ROI, incremental revenue, margin impact, cannibalization
- Context: Competitive activity, market conditions, customer response
- Actions: Approve promotion, Adjust timing, Increase investment, Cancel/pivot
- Detail Level: Medium (by promotion, product family, customer segment)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Focuses on which product categories?
- How much incremental volume vs. cannibalization?
- Promotion speed (how fast decides)?
- Sensitivity to competitive activity?
Data Inputs
- Promotion plans and ROI models
- Historical promotion effectiveness
- Demand forecast with/without promotion
- Pricing and elasticity data
- Competitive activity and pricing
- NPI demand ramps
Part 2: Financial Decision Flow Personas
Overview
Financial flow is about capital allocation and value creation. Each role manages different aspects of financial performance and risk.
Persona 8: Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Primary Decision Authority: Strategic capital allocation, M&A, financing, enterprise-wide profitability and risk
Decision Focus
- Strategic capital allocation (CapEx, R&D, M&A)
- Enterprise profitability and ROIC
- Balance sheet optimization
- Cash flow and liquidity management
- Investor communication and equity value
Platform Utility
- Strategic Financial Dashboard (executive level)
- Forward P&L, cash flow, ROIC by business unit
- Capital allocation waterfall
- Cash flow bridge (operating, investing, financing)
- Enterprise-wide risk dashboard
- Strategic KPIs (revenue growth, margin, ROIC, FCF)
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Strategic (e.g., "Operating margin declining 40bps YTD due to supply chain inflation, requires $2.1M productivity initiative")
- Hero Section: P&L waterfall + ROIC by BU + cash flow summary
- Metrics: Revenue growth, EBIT margin, ROIC, FCF, debt ratios, strategic KPIs
- Context: Year-over-year trends, guidance vs. actual, strategic risks
- Actions: Approve capital plan, Escalate margin pressure, Authorize special spending, Request detailed analysis
- Detail Level: Executive summary (by business unit, strategic theme)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Which KPIs does CFO spend most time on?
- How often reviews forecast vs. guidance?
- Requires drill-down into detail?
- Decision speed on capital allocation?
Data Inputs
- Enterprise financial plans
- Capital project pipeline
- Cash flow forecasts
- Strategic KPIs and targets
- Guidance and market expectations
- S&OP operational drivers
Persona 9: VP/Director of FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
Primary Decision Authority: Scenario modeling, budget allocation, what-if financial models linking operational drivers to P&L
Decision Focus
- Scenario financial modeling
- Budget development and variance analysis
- Cost reduction opportunity identification
- Operational driver sensitivity (what drives margin?)
- Rolling forecasts and AOP updates
Platform Utility
- Integrated Financial Models
- Operational drivers linked to P&L (e.g., volume → COGS → margin)
- Scenario modeling engine (waterfall scenarios to P&L)
- Variance analysis (plan vs. actual, forecast vs. guidance)
- Cost structure and sensitivity analysis
- Rolling forecast and AOP reconciliation
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Analytical (e.g., "COGS inflation $4.2M vs. plan; demand forecast +3% could offset via volume leverage")
- Hero Section: Variance waterfall + sensitivity analysis + scenario comparison
- Metrics: Variance $, %, driver impact, scenario P&L delta, sensitivity coefficients
- Context: Root causes, mitigation levers, scenario assumptions
- Actions: Model scenario, Adjust assumptions, Recommend action, Update forecast
- Detail Level: High (by cost category, driver, scenario)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Which operational drivers are most sensitive?
- How often runs "what-if" scenarios?
- Focuses on which variance drivers?
- Collaborates with which functions?
Data Inputs
- Operational plans (S&OP demand, supply, pricing)
- Cost structure and historical actuals
- Budget allocations
- Financial assumptions and sensitivities
- Variance drivers and analysis
Persona 10: Controller / Chief Accounting Officer
Primary Decision Authority: Financial accuracy, internal controls, compliance with regulations, data integrity and audit trail
Decision Focus
- Financial data accuracy and completeness
- Internal controls and compliance
- Regulatory reporting requirements
- Audit readiness
- Data governance and integrity
Platform Utility
- Data Integrity & Audit Trail Dashboard
- Data source validation and reconciliation
- Control testing and exception tracking
- Regulatory compliance checklist
- Audit workpaper support
- Data lineage and traceability
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Compliance (e.g., "Data completeness for EMEA region 94%, 3 exceptions in Q3 forecast")
- Hero Section: Data quality scorecard + exceptions and remediation
- Metrics: Data completeness %, validation pass rate, exception count, audit risk
- Context: Exception details, root causes, remediation plans, timeline
- Actions: Request remediation, Escalate audit risk, Approve as-is with note, Adjust scope
- Detail Level: Medium-high (by data source, control, exception)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- How sensitive to data quality thresholds?
- Requires detailed exception investigation?
- Responds to audit risk alerts?
- Decision speed on remediation?
Data Inputs
- Data source validation results
- Control test results
- Regulatory requirement checklist
- Audit exception list
- Data lineage and reconciliation
Persona 11: Treasurer / Treasury Manager
Primary Decision Authority: Liquidity management, working capital optimization, FX and debt risk management
Decision Focus
- Cash flow forecasting and management
- Working capital optimization (DPO, DSO, DIO)
- Foreign exchange hedging
- Debt management and refinancing
- Short-term investment and liquidity reserve
Platform Utility
- Working Capital & Cash Flow Dashboard (granular)
- Daily/weekly/monthly cash position and forecast
- Working capital by component (AR, AP, inventory)
- FX exposure and hedging requirements
- Debt schedule and covenant monitoring
- Liquidity and stress scenarios
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Financial (e.g., "Cash position tight in March (-$52M), FX headwind +$3.2M, requires $45M working capital improvement")
- Hero Section: Cash flow bridge + working capital by component
- Metrics: Cash position, WC %, DSO/DPO/DIO, FX exposure, covenant ratios
- Context: Seasonality, FX movements, capital expenditure timing
- Actions: Optimize working capital, Adjust payment terms, Execute FX hedge, Request credit facility increase
- Detail Level: High (daily/weekly cash, by currency, by component)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Focuses on which WC levers?
- How sensitive to FX movements?
- Hedging frequency and strategy?
- Cash forecasting accuracy review?
Data Inputs
- Sales and receivable forecast
- Purchase and payable schedules
- Inventory projections
- Capital expenditure schedule
- FX positions and rates
- Debt schedule
Persona 12: Head of Investor Relations
Primary Decision Authority: External financial communication and narrative, investor expectations, equity value story
Decision Focus
- Quarterly earnings narrative
- Investor guidance and expectations management
- Key performance indicator (KPI) story and messaging
- Historical vs. forecast reconciliation
- Risk narrative and mitigation story
Platform Utility
- KPI Dashboard & Investor-Ready Reporting
- Key metrics tracking vs. guidance
- Historical data (5-year trends)
- Forecast vs. guidance reconciliation with narrative
- Peer benchmarking
- Risk indicator dashboard
- Management narrative support
Page Generation Requirements
- Headline Type: Narrative (e.g., "Q2 earnings beat guidance by $0.08, FY24 track to $2.35 EPS vs. $2.30 guidance, supply chain normalization key driver")
- Hero Section: KPI waterfall (Guidance | Forecast | Actual) + key message
- Metrics: EPS, revenue growth, margin, ROIC, guidance vs. actual
- Context: Key drivers of performance, peer comparison, risk mitigation
- Actions: Approve messaging, Request detail for investor call, Escalate gap, Update guidance
- Detail Level: Medium (investor-ready narrative, not too much detail)
Interaction Patterns to Track
- Which KPIs matter most to investors?
- Frequency of guidance reviews?
- Requires detailed reconciliation?
- Investor meeting preparation timing?
Data Inputs
- Financial forecast and actual
- Investor guidance and expectations
- Peer benchmarking data
- Risk indicators
- Management narrative points
- Market sentiment and news
Part 3: Persona System Architecture
Persona Definition Schema
interface Persona {
// Identity
id: string; // "supply_chain_director"
name: string; // "VP/Director of Supply Chain & Operations"
flow: "sop" | "financial"; // Decision flow
priority: number; // For new user matching (1-12)
// Decision Authority & Focus
primaryAuthority: string; // "Production capacity, inventory levels, supplier risk"
decisionFocus: string[]; // Array of key decisions
// Platform Needs
primaryDashboard: string; // "supply_demand_gap"
keyMetrics: string[]; // ["gap_size", "timeline", "inventory_days"]
detailLevel: "executive" | "medium" | "high";
// Page Generation
headlineType: string; // "operational"
heroChartType: string; // "supply_demand_gap"
contextFactors: string[]; // ["policy_routing", "weather", "lead_time_variability"]
actions: string[]; // Available actions
// Data Inputs
requiredDataSources: string[]; // What data needed
externalDataNeeds: string[]; // Weather, policy, economic
// Learning Profile
interactionPatterns: {
focusAreas: string[]; // What does this persona focus on?
decisionSpeed: string; // "minutes" | "hours" | "days"
dataPreferences: string[]; // External data usage, detail level
collaborationPatterns: string[]; // Which other personas do they interact with?
};
// Persona Evolution
defaultProfile: PersonaProfile; // Initial learning model
templates: PageTemplate[]; // Role-specific page templates
}
interface PersonaProfile {
// Behavioral patterns for this persona
detailPreference: number; // 0-100: Executive summary to detailed
externalDataUsage: number; // 0-100: Ignores external data to data-driven
decisionSpeed: number; // 0-100: Deliberative to fast
collaborationFrequency: number; // 0-100: Independent to collaborative
// Learned interactions
metricPreferences: Map<string, number>; // Which metrics does this persona care about?
actionPreferences: Map<string, number>; // Which actions does this persona take?
dataSourcePreferences: Map<string, number>; // Which data sources do they use?
// Confidence & metadata
sampleSize: number; // How many users contributing to profile?
lastUpdated: Date;
version: string;
}
interface PageTemplate {
id: string;
personaId: string;
contextType: string; // "pre_read" | "workbench" | "dashboard"
layout: string; // Component layout structure
defaultChartType: string;
actionButtons: string[];
detailSections: string[];
}
Part 4: User Onboarding & Persona Matching
Initial User Registration
Step 1: Role Selection
User selects from 12 roles. Backend maps to persona_id.
SELECT DISTINCT persona_id, persona_name, flow
FROM personas
ORDER BY flow, priority
Step 2: Initial Profile Creation
INSERT INTO user_profiles (
user_id,
persona_id,
persona_profile, -- Clone default persona profile
custom_preferences,
created_at
)
VALUES (...)
-- At this point, use DEFAULT persona profile
Step 3: First Page Load
When user first accesses dashboard:
1. Fetch user_profiles[user_id].persona_profile (default template)
2. Generate page using that persona's preferences
3. Start tracking interactions
Part 5: Persona Learning & Evolution
How Personas Learn
Individual User Learning (Fast - Real Time)
Every interaction updates that user's profile:
UPDATE user_profiles
SET persona_profile = jsonb_set(
persona_profile,
'{metric_preferences}',
metric_preferences || newPrefs
)
WHERE user_id = $1
Persona Template Evolution (Slow - Weekly/Monthly)
Scheduled job that analyzes all users in a persona:
SELECT persona_id, COUNT(*) as user_count
FROM user_profiles
WHERE persona_id = 'supply_chain_director'
AND created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '1 month'
GROUP BY persona_id
FOR EACH persona:
-- Aggregate learnings across all users
avgDetailPreference = AVG(persona_profile->>'detail_preference')
avgExternalDataUsage = AVG(persona_profile->>'external_data_usage')
...
-- Update DEFAULT template
UPDATE personas
SET default_profile = {
detail_preference: avgDetailPreference,
external_data_usage: avgExternalDataUsage,
...
}
WHERE id = persona_id
Interaction Tracking for Learning
What to Track
| Event | Data Collected | Used For |
|---|---|---|
headline_viewed | time_spent, scrolled_to_detail | Understanding attention patterns |
chart_interacted | chart_type, zoom_level, drill_down | Chart preference learning |
metric_focused | metric_id, time_spent, compared_to | Metric importance scoring |
external_data_used | data_source, triggered_action | External data utility |
action_taken | action_id, outcome, decision_time | Action effectiveness |
collaborated_with | other_persona, communication_pattern | Cross-persona workflows |
Learning Engine Logic
FUNCTION update_persona_profile(user_id, event_type, event_data):
// 1. Get current user profile
profile = DB.user_profiles[user_id]
// 2. Update individual preferences
CASE event_type:
WHEN "metric_focused":
profile.metricPreferences[event_data.metric] += 10
WHEN "action_taken":
profile.actionPreferences[event_data.action] += 5
record_outcome(user_id, action, success/failure)
WHEN "external_data_used":
profile.externalDataUsage += 2
// 3. Normalize (keep 0-100 scale)
profile = normalize(profile)
// 4. Save
DB.user_profiles[user_id] = profile
// 5. Check if profile changed enough to warrant persona re-evaluation
IF distance(profile, current_persona.default_profile) > THRESHOLD:
// User behavior diverging from persona - investigate
// Or offer persona switch
Part 6: Page Generation Powered by Personas
The Persona-Driven Page Generation Pipeline
User Request
↓
[1] Get User Persona Profile
├─ persona_id (from registration)
└─ persona_profile (learned behaviors)
↓
[2] Get Context
├─ page_context (pre_read, workbench, dashboard)
├─ user_role (supply chain vs financial)
└─ data_context (what data available)
↓
[3] Data Gathering & Anomaly Detection
├─ Fetch all relevant data
├─ Detect anomalies (2+ std dev)
├─ Quantify impact ($, %, timeline)
└─ Enrich with external data (weather, policy, econ)
↓
[4] Headline Generation
├─ Filter anomalies for persona interest
├─ Rank by persona metric_preferences
├─ Select top 3-5 anomalies
└─ Generate LLM headline for each
↓
[5] Hero Section Selection
├─ Pick anomaly with highest impact
├─ Select chart type based on:
│ ├─ persona detailLevel
│ ├─ persona chartPreferences
│ └─ data_type
└─ Build hero with headline + chart + metric
↓
[6] Detail Section Selection
├─ Filter detail elements by:
│ ├─ persona detailLevel
│ ├─ persona dataSourcePreferences
│ ├─ contextual relevance
│ └─ external data (weather/policy)
└─ Organize by persona actionPreferences
↓
[7] Actions Selection
├─ Get persona's typical actions
├─ Filter for current context
├─ Add action impact estimates
└─ Rank by effectiveness (from learning)
↓
[8] Render Page
├─ Use persona's preferred template
├─ Inherit colors, fonts, layout from persona
└─ Track rendering metrics
↓
Page Delivered
Part 7: Business intelligence-Style Page Examples by Persona
Example 1: Supply Chain Director Pre-Read
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HEADLINE (Data-Driven) │
│ Frankfurt warehouse overstock: 23% above target, │
│ $2.3M working capital at risk │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HERO SECTION │
│ │
│ [Waterfall Chart] │ Key Metric: -$2.3M │
│ Target: 5,200 units │ Coverage: 8.2 weeks │
│ Actual: 12,450 units │ (target: 4.5 weeks) │
│ Excess: 7,250 units │ │
│ Cost: $2.3M │ Driver: Tariff │
│ │ hoarding 3 weeks ago │
│ [Inventory Trend Line with Spike] │ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ROOT CAUSE SECTION │
│ │
│ External Factor: US tariff increase announced Jan 15 │
│ Impact: 3-week hoarding behavior (Feb 1-21) │
│ Supplier: ABC Corp diversifying away from China │
│ Timeline: Routing change 45 days (policy lead time) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ACTIONS │
│ │
│ [Primary] Reduce inventory by 7,250 units in 4 weeks │
│ [Secondary] Accelerate demand planning for Q2 │
│ [Tertiary] Adjust supplier routing per FTA settlement │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AUDIT TRAIL │
│ │
│ Detected: 2025-10-20 (anomaly detection) │
│ Policy Event: US tariff 20%→25% (Jan 15) │
│ External Data: Weather spike drove demand (Feb 3) │
│ Recommended Action: 2025-10-22 │
│ Owner: Supply Chain Director │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Example 2: CFO Strategic Dashboard
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HEADLINE (Strategic) │
│ Operating margin declining 40bps YTD due to supply chain │
│ inflation, $2.1M productivity initiative required │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HERO SECTION │
│ │
│ [P&L Waterfall] │ Key Metrics: │
│ Revenue: $1,250M │ Target EBIT: $150M │
│ COGS: ($875M) - inflation +$12M │ Current: $148M │
│ OpEx: ($180M) │ Gap: -$2.1M │
│ EBIT: $195M │ │
│ │ ROIC: 12.3% │
│ [Margin Trend (40bps down YTD)] │ (Target: 13%) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ DRIVERS & MITIGATION │
│ │
│ Supply Chain Inflation: +$12M (+1.3% of COGS) │
│ └─ Mitigation: Supplier renegotiation ($4M), sourcing │
│ alternative ($5M), automation ($3M) │
│ │
│ Demand Forecast: -3% vs. plan ($8M revenue impact) │
│ └─ Mitigation: Market recovery Q4 ($5M), new products │
│ ($3M), promotion timing ($2M) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ACTIONS │
│ │
│ [Approve] Productivity Initiative ($2.1M commitment) │
│ [Escalate] Demand forecast ($8M risk) to VP Sales │
│ [Monitor] Margin recovery timeline (next 4 weeks) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Part 8: Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: Persona System Foundation (2-3 weeks)
Tasks:
- Create
personastable with schema from Part 3 - Create
user_profilestable (user + persona mapping + learning) - Implement persona assignment in registration flow
- Build initial persona templates for all 12 roles
- Implement basic profile cloning (default → user)
Deliverables:
- Personas database with all 12 roles
- User registration flows to role selection
- User profile initialization
Phase 2: Interaction Tracking & Learning (2-3 weeks)
Tasks:
- Define interaction event schema (Part 5)
- Implement event tracking in frontend (UserInteractionTracker enhancement)
- Build persona profile update logic
- Create persona evolution job (weekly aggregation)
- Build visualization of persona learning over time
Deliverables:
- Complete interaction tracking
- Individual user learning
- Persona template evolution
Phase 3: Headline Generation & Hero Section (2-3 weeks)
Tasks:
- Build anomaly detection service
- Build impact quantification service
- Build headline generator (LLM + rule-based)
- Build HeroSection component (Business intelligence-style)
- Integrate with page generation pipeline
Deliverables:
- Data-driven headlines
- Hero section component
- Integration into page pipeline
Phase 4: Persona-Driven Page Generation (2-3 weeks)
Tasks:
- Build AdaptivePageGenerator service
- Implement context router (pre-read vs. workbench vs. dashboard)
- Build detail section selector (persona-aware)
- Build action recommender (persona-aware)
- Integration with existing page renderer
Deliverables:
- Persona-driven pages
- Context-aware layouts
- Business intelligence-style structure
Phase 5: External Data Integration (1-2 weeks)
Tasks:
- Link M3 external data (weather, policy, econ) to page generation
- Build external data enrichment service
- Integrate into headline and detail generation
- Add context badges for external factors
Deliverables:
- External data in page generation
- Enhanced headlines with external context
Part 9: Success Metrics
How We Know This Works
| Metric | Target | Measures |
|---|---|---|
| User Engagement | Pages viewed per user > 2x | Are personas driving discovery? |
| Decision Speed | Average decision time < 10 min | Are pages helping users decide faster? |
| Persona Accuracy | User satisfaction with persona > 85% | Did we match the user correctly? |
| Headline Relevance | User acts on top headline > 40% | Are headlines driving action? |
| External Data Impact | Policy/weather in 60% of decisions | Is external data integrated? |
| Learning Effectiveness | Persona template converges < 6 months | Do personas evolve quickly? |
| Page Personalization | Page variance across users > 60% | Are pages truly personalized? |
Conclusion
This Role Personas & Decision Archetypes Framework is ChainAlign's secret sauce because it:
- Understands the human - Each role has different priorities, decisions, and contexts
- Adapts intelligently - Pages change based on who is viewing and how they decide
- Learns continuously - Persona templates improve as more users interact
- Scales personalization - One persona template serves many users
- Drives action - Pages are optimized for each persona's decision authority and focus
The result: Business intelligence-quality pages that feel built just for you, continuously getting smarter about how you make decisions.
Next Steps: Ready to implement Phase 1 (Persona System Foundation)?