Financial Intelligence & CFO Objectives System
This document describes the Financial Intelligence system for inferring CFO strategic priorities from historical financial data.
Overview
The Financial Intelligence system consists of three components:
- Financial Data Ingestion Service - Ingests and validates financial data from multiple sources
- Strategic Objectives Inference Engine - Infers CFO priorities from financial trends using AI
- API Routes - Exposes endpoints for the frontend to integrate with the system
Architecture
Three-Tension Framework
CFO strategic decisions are modeled across three simultaneous tension points:
1. Growth vs. Risk (Score: 0-1, 0=conservative, 1=aggressive)
- Low Score (0-0.3): Risk-averse, focus on operational efficiency
- Approve conservative growth investments
- Prioritize margin expansion
- Minimize execution complexity
- Medium Score (0.4-0.6): Balanced approach
- Moderate growth investments
- Improve profitability while growing
- Managed market expansion
- High Score (0.7-1.0): Aggressive growth focus
- Approve new market entry and R&D spending
- Accept some margin compression
- Aggressive revenue targets
2. Solvency vs. Liquidity (Score: 0-1, 0=cash preservation, 1=debt reduction)
- Low Score (0-0.3): Liquidity focus
- Build cash reserves
- Minimize debt repayment
- Fund strategic flexibility
- Medium Score (0.4-0.6): Balanced debt management
- Maintain steady debt/EBITDA
- Fund operations from FCF
- High Score (0.7-1.0): Solvency/deleveraging focus
- Aggressive debt reduction
- Prioritize balance sheet strength
- Reduce financial risk
3. Short-Term vs. Long-Term (Score: 0-1, 0=EPS focus, 1=innovation/future focus)
- Low Score (0-0.3): Near-term EPS focus
- Optimize quarterly earnings
- Minimize long-term investments
- Short-term cash generation
- Medium Score (0.4-0.6): Balanced investment
- Steady R&D spending (4-6% revenue)
- Maintain innovation capacity
- High Score (0.7-1.0): Innovation/long-term focus
- Multi-year R&D projects
- Invest in future capabilities
- Accept short-term EPS pressure for growth
Financial Data Ingestion Service
CSV Import Format
Upload CSV files with the following columns:
year,revenue,cogs,opex,ebitda,net_income,total_assets,total_debt,equity,cash,operating_cf,capex,rd_spend,dividend_paid,gross_margin_pct
Required fields:
year- Fiscal year (e.g., 2021)revenue- Annual revenuecogs- Cost of goods soldnet_income- Net income
Optional fields:
opex- Operating expensesebitda- EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization)total_debt- Total debt outstandingrd_spend- R&D spendingoperating_cf- Operating cash flow- Other balance sheet and cash flow items
Data Validation
The system validates:
-
P&L Integrity
- Revenue ≥ COGS
- Net Income ≤ Gross Profit
- Gross Profit = Revenue - COGS
-
Data Quality
- CSV score: 0.85 (baseline for uploaded data)
- Penalized -0.1 per validation issue found
- Example: Invalid P&L = quality score of 0.75
-
Financial Metrics Calculated
- Profitability: Gross margin %, Operating margin %, Net margin %
- Solvency: Debt/EBITDA, Interest coverage ratio
- Growth: Revenue CAGR, YoY growth rate
- Innovation: R&D intensity (% revenue), R&D growth
- Cash Flow: FCF/NI ratio, FCF margin
FRED Integration
Optionally integrate macro reference data from the Federal Reserve:
POST /api/financial-intelligence/ingest-fred
{
"fredSeriesIds": [
"FEDFUNDS", # Fed Funds Rate
"CPIAUCSL", # Inflation (CPI)
"INDPRO", # Industrial Production
"MMNRNJ" # Money supply
]
}
Useful FRED series for CFO analysis:
- FEDFUNDS - Fed Funds Rate (WACC context)
- CPIAUCSL - Inflation (pricing power analysis)
- GS10 - 10-year treasury yield (cost of capital)
- UNRATE - Unemployment rate (economic cycle)
- INDPRO - Industrial production (industry growth)
Strategic Objectives Inference Engine
Trend Detection
The engine analyzes financial trends to detect strategic patterns:
Growth Trends
- Revenue CAGR calculation
- Trajectory classification:
- Accelerating: CAGR > 10%
- Stable: 5-10% CAGR
- Decelerating: < 5% CAGR
Profitability Trends
- Gross margin trend (expanding/compressing)
- Operating margin evolution
- Margin momentum affects growth assessment
Solvency Trends
- Debt/EBITDA trajectory
- Deleveraging: ratio declining
- Leveraging: ratio increasing
Innovation Trends
- R&D intensity (% of revenue)
- R&D growth rate (CAGR of R&D spending)
- Commitment to future capabilities
Cash Flow Analysis
- Free cash flow margin
- Cash conversion efficiency
- Ability to fund strategic initiatives
Tension Score Calculation
Each tension is scored 0-1 based on historical trends:
// Growth vs Risk (0=conservative, 1=aggressive)
growthScore = Math.min(1, revenue_CAGR / 20)
// Adjusted down if margins compressing while growing
if (margin_trend === 'compressing' && CAGR > 5) {
growthScore = Math.min(growthScore, 0.7)
}
// Solvency vs Liquidity (0=cash preservation, 1=debt reduction)
if (debt_to_ebitda_trend === 'deleveraging') {
solvencyScore = 0.7 // Solvency focus
} else if (debt_to_ebitda_trend === 'leveraging') {
solvencyScore = 0.3 // Liquidity focus
} else {
solvencyScore = 0.5 // Balanced
}
// Short-term vs Long-term (0=EPS focus, 1=innovation)
if (rd_growth > 10%) {
timeHorizonScore = 0.75 // Innovation focus
} else if (rd_intensity > 5%) {
timeHorizonScore = 0.65 // Long-term lean
} else {
timeHorizonScore = 0.5 // Balanced
}
Objective Generation
Three specific objectives are generated with:
- Target metrics (revenue growth, debt/EBITDA, R&D intensity, etc.)
- Current values for comparison
- Key implications for decision-making
- Confidence score (0-1)
Coherence Validation
The system checks for contradictory objectives:
-
Growth ↔ Liquidity Conflict
- High growth (>0.8) + extreme liquidity focus (<0.2) = incoherent
- Reason: Growth requires capital, cash preservation limits it
-
Innovation ↔ Deleveraging Conflict
- High long-term focus (>0.7) + high deleveraging (>0.7) = risky
- Reason: Both require strong FCF; limited resources
Confidence Scoring
Overall confidence based on:
baseConfidence = 0.5
// More data = higher confidence
if (dataYears >= 10) baseConfidence = 0.9
else if (dataYears >= 5) baseConfidence = 0.8
else if (dataYears >= 3) baseConfidence = 0.7
// Coherence issues reduce confidence
overallConfidence = baseConfidence × coherenceScore
API Endpoints
1. Upload CSV Financial Data
POST /api/financial-intelligence/ingest-csv
Content-Type: multipart/form-data
[Attach CSV file with column headers matching the format above]
Response: {
"success": true,
"message": "Ingested 10 financial records",
"recordCount": 10,
"dataQualityFlags": []
}
2. Fetch FRED Macro Data
POST /api/financial-intelligence/ingest-fred
Content-Type: application/json
{
"fredSeriesIds": ["FEDFUNDS", "CPIAUCSL"]
}
Response: {
"success": true,
"fredData": {
"FEDFUNDS": {
"series_id": "FEDFUNDS",
"observations": [...],
"units": "Percent",
"frequency": "Monthly"
}
},
"tenantId": "..."
}
3. Get Stored Financial Data
GET /api/financial-intelligence/financial-data?minYear=2013
Response: {
"success": true,
"recordCount": 10,
"data": [
{
"period_year": 2013,
"revenue": 1000000,
"cogs": 600000,
"gross_margin_pct": 40,
"debt_to_ebitda": 3.3,
"rd_intensity_pct": 4,
...
},
...
]
}
4. Infer CFO Objectives
POST /api/financial-intelligence/infer-objectives
Content-Type: application/json
{
"minYear": 2013 // Optional, defaults to 10 years ago
}
Response: {
"success": true,
"tenantId": "...",
"dataYears": 10,
"inferenceTimestamp": "2025-10-22T...",
"tensionScores": {
"growthVsRisk": 0.65, # Balanced-growth focus
"solvencyVsLiquidity": 0.55, # Slightly solvency-focused
"shortVsLongTerm": 0.70 # Long-term innovation focus
},
"trends": {
"growth": {
"cagr": 11.2,
"trajectory": "accelerating",
"signal": "Growth trajectory"
},
"profitability": {
"avgGrossMargin": 35.2,
"trend": "compressing",
"signal": "Margins declining"
},
"solvency": {
"trend": "deleveraging",
"signal": "Debt management priority"
},
"innovation": {
"currentIntensity": 6.0,
"growth": 15.5,
"signal": "Innovation investment priority"
},
"cashFlow": {
"avgMargin": 15.8,
"signal": "Cash generation capability"
}
},
"objectives": [
{
"id": "obj_growth_001",
"tension_category": "Growth vs. Risk",
"name": "Balanced Growth Strategy",
"description": "Target annual revenue growth of 5-10%",
"tension_position": 0.65,
"target_metrics": [
{
"metric": "Revenue CAGR",
"target": "5-10%",
"current": "11.2%"
},
{
"metric": "EBITDA Margin",
"target": "18-22%",
"current": "6.0%"
}
],
"key_implications": [
"Approve growth investments in new markets",
"Maintain OpEx discipline relative to revenue",
"Monitor execution complexity"
],
"confidence": 0.80,
"reasoning": "Inferred from 11.2% CAGR and compressing margins"
},
{
"id": "obj_solvency_001",
"tension_category": "Solvency vs. Liquidity",
"name": "Balanced Debt Strategy",
"description": "Maintain debt/EBITDA ratio within optimal range",
"tension_position": 0.55,
"target_metrics": [
{
"metric": "Debt/EBITDA",
"target": "2.0-3.0x",
"current": "2.5x"
},
{
"metric": "FCF Margin",
"target": "15-20%",
"current": "18.0%"
}
],
"key_implications": [
"Balance growth with deleveraging",
"Maintain liquidity for strategic flexibility",
"Optimize WACC through debt management"
],
"confidence": 0.75,
"reasoning": "Inferred from debt trajectory: deleveraging"
},
{
"id": "obj_innovation_001",
"tension_category": "Short-Term vs. Long-Term",
"name": "Long-term Innovation Strategy",
"description": "Balance EPS targets with R&D and capacity investments",
"tension_position": 0.70,
"target_metrics": [
{
"metric": "R&D % Revenue",
"target": "6-8%",
"current": "6.0%"
},
{
"metric": "New Product Revenue",
"target": "15-25%",
"current": "TBD"
}
],
"key_implications": [
"Approve multi-year R&D projects",
"Protect innovation investments even in downturns",
"Establish clear innovation pipeline metrics"
],
"confidence": 0.70,
"reasoning": "Inferred from R&D investment trend: 15.5% growth"
}
],
"validation": {
"isCoherent": true,
"issues": [],
"coherenceScore": 1.0
},
"overallConfidence": 0.90,
"message": "Inferred CFO priorities with 90% confidence"
}
5. Get Cached Objectives
GET /api/financial-intelligence/objectives/:tenantId
# Returns the most recent inferred objectives for the tenant
6. Validate Financial Data
POST /api/financial-intelligence/validate-data
Content-Type: application/json
{
"records": [
{
"period_year": 2021,
"revenue": 1000000,
"cogs": 600000,
"net_income": 100000
},
{
"period_year": 2022,
"revenue": 1200000,
"cogs": 1400000, # Invalid: COGS > Revenue
"net_income": 200000
}
]
}
Response: {
"success": true,
"totalRecords": 2,
"validRecords": 1,
"validationRate": 50.0,
"details": [
{
"year": 2021,
"isValid": true,
"issues": []
},
{
"year": 2022,
"isValid": false,
"issues": [
"Revenue < COGS",
"Net Income > Gross Profit"
]
}
]
}
7. Calculate Financial Metrics
POST /api/financial-intelligence/calculate-metrics
Content-Type: application/json
{
"revenue": 1000000,
"cogs": 600000,
"opex": 200000,
"ebitda": 200000,
"netIncome": 100000,
"totalDebt": 500000,
"rdSpend": 80000
}
Response: {
"success": true,
"metrics": {
"grossMarginPct": 40.0,
"operatingMarginPct": 20.0,
"netMarginPct": 10.0,
"debtToEBITDA": 2.5,
"rdIntensityPct": 8.0
}
}
Example: CFO Demo Scenario
Sample Data
The repository includes sample financial data for a growing company with strategic transitions:
File: /backend/samples/cfo-demo-financials.csv
Key characteristics (2013-2022):
- Revenue CAGR: 11.2% (accelerating growth)
- Gross Margin: 40% → 28% (compression due to pricing pressure and competition)
- Net Margin: 10% → 25% (improvement despite margin compression through operational efficiency)
- Debt/EBITDA: 3.3x → 0.5x (aggressive deleveraging)
- R&D Intensity: 4% → 6% (increasing long-term investment)
Inferred Objectives
Based on this data, the system would infer:
-
Balanced Growth Strategy (0.65 tension score)
- Current growth is healthy (11.2% CAGR)
- Target 5-10% sustainable growth
- Address margin compression through efficiency
- Implications: Approve selective growth, improve operations
-
Debt Reduction Strategy (0.55-0.7 tension score)
- Strong deleveraging trend
- Target Debt/EBITDA of 2-2.5x
- Focus on balance sheet strength
- Implications: Continue debt paydown, maintain financial flexibility
-
Innovation Investment Strategy (0.70 tension score)
- R&D growth rate of 15.5% (highest growth in the company)
- Current R&D intensity acceptable (6%)
- Target 6-8% R&D spend
- Implications: Support multi-year R&D projects, protect innovation even if earnings pressure
Testing
Unit Tests
# Test Financial Data Ingestion Service
npm test -- __tests__/services/FinancialDataIngestionService.test.js
# Test Strategic Objectives Inference Engine
npm test -- __tests__/services/StrategicObjectivesInferenceEngine.test.js
# Test API Routes
npm test -- __tests__/routes/financialIntelligenceRoutes.test.js
Sample Test Cases
Data Ingestion:
- ✓ CSV parsing with valid data
- ✓ P&L integrity validation
- ✓ Financial metrics calculation (profitability, solvency, growth, innovation)
- ✓ Data quality scoring
- ✓ Missing optional fields handling
Objectives Inference:
- ✓ Trend detection (growth, profitability, solvency, innovation, cash flow)
- ✓ Tension score calculation
- ✓ Objective generation with appropriate targets
- ✓ Coherence validation for contradictory objectives
- ✓ Confidence scoring based on data years and coherence
API Routes:
- ✓ CSV ingestion endpoint
- ✓ FRED data fetching
- ✓ Financial data retrieval
- ✓ Objectives inference endpoint
- ✓ Data validation endpoint
- ✓ Metrics calculation endpoint
- ✓ Authentication and tenant isolation
Implementation Status
✅ Completed
- Financial Data Ingestion Service (350+ lines)
- Strategic Objectives Inference Engine (500+ lines)
- API routes with 7 endpoints
- Comprehensive test suites (900+ lines total)
- Sample financial data (10-year history)
- Server integration
🔄 In Progress
- Database container setup for integration tests
- Frontend integration (demand/supply workbenches)
- Demo scenario implementations
📋 TODO
- Add more FRED series mappings
- Implement Scenario Financial Service (P&L/Cash Flow modeling)
- Product & BOM service integration
- Executive dashboard frontend
Related Documentation
- Architecture:
/docs/architecture/functional-specifications/Financial-Data-Ingestion-Service-FSD.md - Engine Design:
/docs/architecture/functional-specifications/Strategic-Objectives-Inference-Engine-FSD.md - CFO Demo:
/docs/go-to-market/cfo-financial-demo-architecture.md - PGMQ Fix:
/docs/worksummary/pgmq-blocker-fix.md
References
- Google Generative AI (Gemini): LLM for hypothesis generation
- PostgreSQL pgvector: Vector embeddings for semantic search
- FRED API: Federal Reserve Economic Data
- Typesense: Full-text search integration
Last Updated: 2025-10-23 Status: Production Ready (pending frontend integration)